Objective:
To test the uniformity of weight of tablets and capsules
whether it comply with the Pharmacopoeial standard or not.
Material and
Apparatus:
Paralgin tablets, Ampillin capsules, weighing balance
and weighing boats.
Method:
Tablets
1.
20 tablets are selected at
random and weighed. The average weight is determined.
2.
Tablets are weighed
individually and for each tablet, the percentage deviation of its weight from
the average weight is determined.
3.
The deviation of individual
weight from the average weight should not exceed the limits given below.
Average weight of tablet
|
Deviation (%)
|
Number of tablets
|
Less than 80 mg.
|
± 10.0
± 20.0
|
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
|
80 mg to 250 mg
|
± 7.5
± 15.0
|
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
|
More than 250 mg.
|
± 5.0
± 10.0
|
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
|
Capsules
1.
20 capsules are selected at
random.
2. A capsule is
weighed. The capsule is opened and the contents are removed as completely as
possible. The emptied shells are weighed. The net weight of its contents is
determined, that is by subtracting the weight of the shells from the weight of
the intact capsule.
3. The
proceduresare repeated with other 19 capsules.
4. The
average net weight from the sum of the individual net weights is determined.
5. The
percentage deviation from the average net weight for each capsule is determined.The
deviation of individual net weight should not exceed the limits given below:
Average net weight of capsule
|
Deviation (%)
|
Number of tablets
|
Less than 300 mg.
|
± 10.0
± 20.0
|
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
|
300 mg or more
|
± 7.5
± 15.0
|
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
|
Results and
Calculation:
Formula
Tablets
Tablets
|
Weight (g)
|
Deviation (%)
|
Total
|
13.6449
|
|
Average
|
0.6822
|
|
1
|
0.6856
|
0.50
|
2
|
0.6881
|
0.86
|
3
|
0.6805
|
-0.25
|
4
|
0.6846
|
0.35
|
5
|
0.6781
|
-0.60
|
6
|
0.6657
|
-2.42
|
7
|
0.6638
|
-2.70
|
8
|
0.6675
|
-2.15
|
9
|
0.6832
|
0.14
|
10
|
0.6890
|
0.99
|
11
|
0.6954
|
1.93
|
12
|
0.6972
|
2.20
|
13
|
0.7000
|
2.61
|
14
|
0.6751
|
-1.04
|
15
|
0.6839
|
0.25
|
16
|
0.6921
|
1.45
|
17
|
0.6727
|
-1.39
|
18
|
0.6625
|
-2.89
|
19
|
0.6905
|
1.22
|
20
|
0.6894
|
1.06
|
Capsules
Capsules
|
Weight (g)
|
Deviation (%)
|
||
Whole
|
Cap
|
Net
|
||
1
|
0.3607
|
0.0583
|
0.3024
|
3.53
|
2
|
0.3590
|
0.0632
|
0.2958
|
1.27
|
3
|
0.3702
|
0.0652
|
0.3050
|
4.42
|
4
|
0.3515
|
0.0651
|
0.2864
|
-1.95
|
5
|
0.3609
|
0.0627
|
0.2982
|
2.09
|
6
|
0.3477
|
0.0649
|
0.2828
|
-3.18
|
7
|
0.3659
|
0.0635
|
0.3024
|
3.53
|
8
|
0.3590
|
0.0609
|
0.2981
|
2.05
|
9
|
0.3554
|
0.0625
|
0.2929
|
0.27
|
10
|
0.3593
|
0.0632
|
0.2961
|
1.37
|
11
|
0.3578
|
0.0633
|
0.2945
|
0.82
|
12
|
0.3385
|
0.0622
|
0.2763
|
-5.41
|
13
|
0.3342
|
0.0618
|
0.2724
|
-6.74
|
14
|
0.3540
|
0.0630
|
0.2910
|
-0.38
|
15
|
0.3439
|
0.0631
|
0.2808
|
-3.87
|
16
|
0.3495
|
0.0672
|
0.2823
|
-3.36
|
17
|
0.3632
|
0.0574
|
0.3058
|
-4.69
|
18
|
0.3522
|
0.0624
|
0.2898
|
-0.79
|
19
|
0.3520
|
0.0592
|
0.2928
|
0.24
|
20
|
0.3584
|
0.0613
|
0.2971
|
1.71
|
Total
|
5.8429
|
|||
Average
|
0.2921
|
Discussion:
The
tablets used is Paralgin(paracetamol500 mg)with average weight of 682 mg therefore,
we used this rule:
More than 250 mg.
|
± 5.0
± 10.0
|
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
|
It seems that all 20 tablets tested did not exceed.The
positive deviation means that the individual weight is more than the average weight
and negative percent deviation indicates individual weight is less than average
weight.
The
capsules used in experiment is Ampicillin trihydrate
(Ampicillin BP 250 mg) with average weight of 292 mg therefore, we used this
rule:
Less than 300 mg.
|
± 10.0
± 20.0
|
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
|
It seems that no capsule deviate more than %.
Conclusion:
All
tablets and capsules tested comply with pharmacopoeial standard of uniformity
of weight.
Question
Give reasons for the non-compliance to test for uniformity
of weight.
The non-compliance to
test for uniformity of weight is due to:
a.
The
decayed/expired/degeneration/decomposed ingredient of the drug.
b.
Uneven feeding of granules into
the die due toirregular movement of the lower punch that cause variation in
capacity die space.
c.
Packing geometry.
References:
Gresham HS.http://science.halleyhosting.com/sci/soph/inquiry/percentdev.htm.
Percent Deviation.Student Watershed
Research Project.Retrieved on23rd December 2013.
Cool you write, the information is very good and interesting, I'll give you a link to my site. tablet
ReplyDeleteLoan Opportunity Offered By Mr, Benjamin That Save My Family From Financial Bondage { 247officedept@gmail.com }
ReplyDeleteHello Everyone, I am Putri Adiratnaa single mom from Jakarta, I would like to share this great testimony on how I got a loan from Mr, Benjamin, when we were driven out of our home when I couldn't pay my bills anymore, After being scammed by various companies online and denied a loan from my bank and some other credit union I visited. My children were taken by the foster care, I was all alone in the street. The day i shamefully walked into an old school mate who introduced me to Daisy Maureen. At first I told her that I am not ready to take any risk of requesting a loan online anymore, but she assured me that I will receive my loan from them. On a second thought, due to my homelessness I had to take a trial and applied for the loan, luckily for me I received a loan of $80,000.00 from Mr, Benjamin. I'm happy I took the risk and applied for the loan. My kids have been given back to me and now I own a home and a business of my own. All thanks and gratitude goes to the help of Mr, Benjamin for giving me a meaning to life when i had lost all hope. If you currently seeking for a loan assistance, you can contact them via: {247officedept@gmail.com WhatsApp +1-989-394-3740.