Sunday, December 29, 2013

UNIFORMITY OF WEIGHT OF TABLETS AND CAPSULES.

Objective:
To test the uniformity of weight of tablets and capsules whether it comply with the Pharmacopoeial standard or not.

Material and Apparatus:
Paralgin tablets, Ampillin capsules, weighing balance and weighing boats.

Method:
Tablets
1.       20 tablets are selected at random and weighed. The average weight is determined.
2.       Tablets are weighed individually and for each tablet, the percentage deviation of its weight from the average weight is determined.
3.       The deviation of individual weight from the average weight should not exceed the limits given below.
Average weight of tablet
Deviation (%)
Number of tablets
Less than 80 mg.
± 10.0
± 20.0
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
80 mg to 250 mg
± 7.5
± 15.0
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
More than 250 mg.
± 5.0
± 10.0
Minimum 18
Maximum 2


Capsules
1.       20 capsules are selected at random.
2.    A capsule is weighed. The capsule is opened and the contents are removed as completely as possible. The emptied shells are weighed. The net weight of its contents is determined, that is by subtracting the weight of the shells from the weight of the intact capsule.
3.    The proceduresare repeated with other 19 capsules.
4.    The average net weight from the sum of the individual net weights is determined.
5.    The percentage deviation from the average net weight for each capsule is determined.The deviation of individual net weight should not exceed the limits given below:
Average net weight of capsule
Deviation (%)
Number of tablets
Less than 300 mg.
± 10.0
± 20.0
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
300 mg or more
± 7.5
± 15.0
Minimum 18
Maximum 2

Results and Calculation:
Formula


Tablets
Tablets
Weight (g)
Deviation (%)
Total
13.6449

Average
0.6822

1
0.6856
0.50
2
0.6881
0.86
3
0.6805
-0.25
4
0.6846
0.35
5
0.6781
-0.60
6
0.6657
-2.42
7
0.6638
-2.70
8
0.6675
-2.15
9
0.6832
0.14
10
0.6890
0.99
11
0.6954
1.93
12
0.6972
2.20
13
0.7000
2.61
14
0.6751
-1.04
15
0.6839
0.25
16
0.6921
1.45
17
0.6727
-1.39
18
0.6625
-2.89
19
0.6905
1.22
20
0.6894
1.06
Capsules
Capsules
Weight (g)
Deviation (%)
Whole
Cap
Net
1
0.3607
0.0583
0.3024
3.53
2
0.3590
0.0632
0.2958
1.27
3
0.3702
0.0652
0.3050
4.42
4
0.3515
0.0651
0.2864
-1.95
5
0.3609
0.0627
0.2982
2.09
6
0.3477
0.0649
0.2828
-3.18
7
0.3659
0.0635
0.3024
3.53
8
0.3590
0.0609
0.2981
2.05
9
0.3554
0.0625
0.2929
0.27
10
0.3593
0.0632
0.2961
1.37
11
0.3578
0.0633
0.2945
0.82
12
0.3385
0.0622
0.2763
-5.41
13
0.3342
0.0618
0.2724
-6.74
14
0.3540
0.0630
0.2910
-0.38
15
0.3439
0.0631
0.2808
-3.87
16
0.3495
0.0672
0.2823
-3.36
17
0.3632
0.0574
0.3058
-4.69
18
0.3522
0.0624
0.2898
-0.79
19
0.3520
0.0592
0.2928
0.24
20
0.3584
0.0613
0.2971
1.71
Total


5.8429

Average


0.2921




Discussion:
                The tablets used is Paralgin(paracetamol500 mg)with average weight of 682 mg therefore, we used this rule:
More than 250 mg.
± 5.0
± 10.0
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
It seems that all 20 tablets tested did not exceed.The positive deviation means that the individual weight is more than the average weight and negative percent deviation indicates individual weight is less than average weight.
                The capsules used in experiment is Ampicillin trihydrate (Ampicillin BP 250 mg) with average weight of 292 mg therefore, we used this rule:
Less than 300 mg.
± 10.0
± 20.0
Minimum 18
Maximum 2
It seems that no capsule deviate more than  %.

Conclusion:
                All tablets and capsules tested comply with pharmacopoeial standard of uniformity of weight.

Question
Give reasons for the non-compliance to test for uniformity of weight.
The non-compliance to test for uniformity of weight is due to:
a.       The decayed/expired/degeneration/decomposed ingredient of the drug.
b.      Uneven feeding of granules into the die due toirregular movement of the lower punch that cause variation in capacity die space.
c.       Packing geometry.

References:
Gresham HS.http://science.halleyhosting.com/sci/soph/inquiry/percentdev.htm. Percent Deviation.Student Watershed Research Project.Retrieved on23rd December 2013.



2 comments:

  1. Cool you write, the information is very good and interesting, I'll give you a link to my site. tablet

    ReplyDelete
  2. Loan Opportunity Offered By Mr, Benjamin That Save My Family From Financial Bondage {  247officedept@gmail.com  }

    Hello Everyone, I am Putri Adiratnaa single mom from Jakarta, I would like to share this great testimony on how I got a loan from Mr, Benjamin, when we were driven out of our home when I couldn't pay my bills anymore, After being scammed by various companies online and denied a loan from my bank and some other credit union I visited. My children were taken by the foster care, I was all alone in the street. The day i shamefully walked into an old school mate who introduced me to Daisy Maureen. At first I told her that I am not ready to take any risk of requesting a loan online anymore, but she assured me that I will receive my loan from them. On a second thought, due to my homelessness I had to take a trial and applied for the loan, luckily for me I received a loan of $80,000.00 from Mr, Benjamin. I'm happy I took the risk and applied for the loan. My kids have been given back to me and now I own a home and a business of my own. All thanks and gratitude goes to  the help of Mr, Benjamin for giving me a meaning to life when i had lost all hope. If you currently seeking for a loan assistance, you can contact them via: {247officedept@gmail.com    WhatsApp +1-989-394-3740.

    ReplyDelete