Friday, December 27, 2013

POWDER FLOW

PRACTICAL 3
Powder Flow

Aim
To study the relationship of hopper’s diameter and size of sand with the rate of powder flow.

Introduction
Powder flow is essential in tablet and capsule production. Each powder of any material has different flow.
In this experiment, a powder flow of various sizes of sand is tested using hopper with different size and its orifice.

Material and apparatus
1.       Narrow hopper with different diameter of orifice:
i.                     8mm.
ii.                   13mm.
iii.                  16mm.
2.       Wide hopper with different diameter of orifice:
i.                     10mm.
ii.                   16mm.
3.       Different size of sand:
i.                     355 micron.
ii.                   500 micron.
iii.                  850 micron.
iv.                 Mixture of various sizes of sand.
4.       Stopwatch.
Method
1.       5 hoppers with different sizes are prepared.
2.       5 different sizes and nature of sand are prepared.
3.       The hopper’s orifice is closed and 100g of sand are poured into the hopper.
4.       The orifice is let open to allow sand flow.
5.       The time taken for all sand to flow out is recorded.
6.       Steps 1 to 5 are repeated using different size of sand and hopper.

Result
Tabulation of data
1.       Time taken for powder to flow out of hopper.
Sand sizes (micron)
Hopper diameter (mm)
350
500
850
Various Sizes
Narrow hopper
8
13.92s
13.82s
16.60s
15.93s
13
4.10s
4.21s
4.81s
4.51s
16
2.71s
2.11s
2.80s
3.61s
Wide hopper
10
8.40s
7.51s
8.82s
6.23s
16
2.81s
4.11s
3.81s
4.31s

2.       Amount of sand left in the hopper.
Sand sizes (micron)
Hopper diameter (mm)
350
500
850
Various Sizes
Narrow hopper
8
A little
A little
A little
A little
13
A quarter of sand
A little
A little
A little
16
A little
A little
A little
A little
Wide hopper
10
A quarter of sand
A quarter of sand
A quarter of sand
A quarter of sand
16
Very little
A little
Very little
A little

Graph
1.       Graph of diameter of orifice of narrow hopper against time taken for powder to fall down.


2.       Graph of Diameter of orifice of wide hopper against time taken for powder to fall down.


Discussion
                In this experiment we chose 5 hoppers (3 narrow cylinder hopper and 2 wide cylinder hopper) with different size of orifice. The size of orifice is measured by its diameter. The size of sand used is also varied; 350 microns, 500 microns, 850 microns and various sizes (mix sand). The sand is let to flow with the effect of the gravity (no shaking/force applied to the hopper to force the sand out). The time is taken when there is no more powder flow out. The leftover of sand in the hopper is observed by its quantity.
                Based on the result obtained, the sand leftover is high when wide hopper with small orifice is used. Based on the graph, the flow of sand took shorter time if the orifice of the hopper used is bigger and vice versa. The width of hopper also affects the time taken for a complete flow. For example, with the same diameter of orifice i.e. 16 mm, the wider hopper recorded slower flow of sand than sand in the narrow hopper maybe due to less adhesion between the wall of hopper and sand particles and the potential energy created by higher sand as sand in narrow hopper is deeper than sand in wide hopper.
 On the other hand, when we compare between the sizes of sand with the time taken for it to flow completely, the relationship is not clear. For example, for 350 microns sand to flow from a wide hopper with 10 mm diameter of orifice takes 8.4 seconds which is longer compared to 500 microns sand (7.51 seconds) but when using 16 mm diameter of hopper, the 350 microns sand flow faster compared to 500 microns sand which is 2.81 seconds compared to 4.11 seconds. This finding maybe affected by other factors such as the angle of the hopper, the cohesion and adhesion between sand particles and the shape of the sand particle.
The accuracy of the reading may not be accurate because this experiment depends on the hand-eye coordination of the tester, therefore, the reading should be taken at least 3 times to get the average result.

Question
1.       What are the factors affecting powder flow?
The factors affecting powder flow are:
a.       Orifice diameter of a hopper.
b.      Hopper width.
c.       Hopper wall angle.
d.      Head size/powder depth.
2.       Based on the test conducted on the powder and which size of hopper that gives the best flow?
The best flow is the fastest and least residue which 500 microns sand flowed through 16 mm of narrow hopper with a little residue in 2.11 seconds.
3.       What method can be used to aid in powder flow?
The methods can be used to aid in powder flow are:
a.       Alteration of particle size & size distribution
b.      Alteration of particle shape/texture.
c.       Alteration of surface forces.
d.      Formulation additives; flow activators.
e.      Alteration of process condition.
                                                               i.      Vibration assisted hopper.
                                                             ii.      Force feeder.

Conclusion
                Powder flow is affected by several factor, one of it is the size of hopper orifice. The bigger the size of an orifice, the shorter the duration for powder to flow whereas the smaller the orifice, the longer the powder flow duration.

References

Aulton, M.E., (2007) Aulton’s Pharmaceutics; the Design and Manufacture of Medicines, 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, Philadelphia.

No comments:

Post a Comment